1. Replaceable polyhedral carbide inserts. (2006). Technical conditions (with Changes No. 1 - 6): interstate standard. Ru Standard No. GOST 19086–80. Moscow: Standartinfrom. [in Russian language]
2. Replaceable multi-faceted cutting carbide square carbide inserts. (2006). Design and dimensions (with Changes No. 1, 2): interstate standard. Ru Standard No. GOST 19049–80. Moscow: Standartinfrom. [in Russian language]
3. Replaceable multi-faceted cutting carbide square carbide inserts with a hole. (2006). Design and dimensions (with Changes No. 1 and 2): interstate standard. Ru Standard No. GOST 19051–80. Moscow: Standartinfrom. [in Russian language]
4. Replaceable multi-faceted cutting carbide square carbide inserts. (2006). Design and dimensions (with Changes No. 1 and 2): interstate standard. Ru Standard No. GOST 19085–80. Moscow: Standartinfrom. [in Russian language]
5. Replaceable multi-faceted cutting carbide square carbide inserts with a rear angle of 11. (2006). Design and dimensions (with Changes No. 1, 2 and 3): interstate standard. Ru Standard No. GOST 19050–80. Moscow: Standartinfrom. [in Russian language]
6. Replaceable multi-faceted cutting carbide square carbide inserts. (2006). Design and dimensions (with Changes No. 1, 2 and 3): interstate standard. Ru Standard No. GOST 24248–80. Moscow: Standartinfrom. [in Russian language]
7. Interchangeable multi-faceted cutting carbide carbide rhombic inserts with an angle of 55, with hole and chipbreaking grooves on two sides. (2006). Design and dimensions (with Changes No. 1, 2 and 3): interstate standard. Ru Standard No. GOST 24257–80. Moscow: Standartinfrom. [in Russian language]
8. Replaceable multifaceted carbide square cutting inserts with a rear angle of 20. (2006). Design and dimensions (with Changes No. 1, 2 and 3): interstate standard. Ru Standard No. GOST 24253–80. Moscow: Standartinfrom. [in Russian language]
9. Chipbreakers replaceable multi-faceted carbide square. (2006). Design and dimensions: Interstate standard. Ru Standard No. GOST 19085–80. Moscow: Standartinfrom. [in Russian language]
10. Replaceable cutting inserts multifaceted carbide pentagonal. (2006). Design and dimensions (with Changes No. 1): Interstate Standard. Ru Standard No. GOST 19063–80. Moscow: Standartinfrom. [in Russian language]
11. Replaceable multi-faceted cutting carbide square carbide inserts with a hole and chip breaking grooves on one side. (2006). Design and dimensions (with Changes No. 1, 2 and 3): interstate standard. Ru Standard No. GOST 19052–80. Moscow: Standartinfrom. [in Russian language]
12. Replaceable multi-faceted carbide cutting inserts with a pentagonal shape with a hole and chip-breaking grooves on one side. (2006). Design and dimensions (with Changes No. 1 and 2): interstate standard. Ru Standard No. GOST 19065–80. Moscow: Standartinfrom. [in Russian language]
13. Replaceable multi-faceted cutting carbide carbide hexagonal inserts with a rear angle of 80, with hole and chipbreaking grooves. (2006). Design and dimensions (with Amendments No. 1 and 2): interstate standard. Ru Standard No. GOST 19048–80. Moscow: Standartinfrom. [in Russian language]
14. Vereschaka A., Mokritskii B., Mokritskaya E. et al. (2017). Two-component end mills with multilayer composite nano-structured coatings as a viable alternative to monolithic carbide end mills. Mechanics & Industry, Vol. 18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2017052. (Available online at www.mechanics-industry.org.)
15. Mokritsii B. Ja., Morozova F. V., Usova T. J. (2017). Results in composite hard-allow and milts design basset on simulation of their operation conditions. International conference on industrial engineering (ISIE): International conference in Industrial Engineering (ICIE 2017). Saint Petersburg. Series of books: Procedia Engineering, Vol. 206, pp. 1093 – 1098.
16. Vereschaka A., Oganyan M., Bublikov Yu. et al. (2018). Increase in Efficiency of the Milling of titanium alloys die to tools with multilayered composite nano-structured Zr–ZrN–(Zr,Al)N and Zr–ZrN–(Zr,Cr,Al)N coatings. Coating, (8). DOI:10.3390/coatings8110395.
17. Chirkov A. P. (2013). The role of metrological support in innovation. Glavniy metrolog, (1), pp. 20 – 24. [in Russian language]
18. Chirkov A. P., Alisov A. A. et al. (2013). Infrastructure support for the implementation of high technology. Socio-economic aspects of technological modernization of modern engineering, pp. 78 – 120. Moscow: ID «Spektr». [in Russian language]
19. Chirkov A. P. (2013). Quantitative assessment of the impact of metrology on the economy. Spravochnik. Inzhenerniy zhurnal, (8), pp. 45 – 51. [in Russian language]
20. Matveev V. I. (2019). Accurate measurements are the foundation of quality and safety 2019. Kontrol'. Diagnostika, (8). [in Russian language] DOI: 10.14489/td.2019.08. pp. 004-011.