Журнал Российского общества по неразрушающему контролю и технической диагностике
The journal of the Russian society for non-destructive testing and technical diagnostic
 
| Русский Русский | English English |
 
Главная
23 | 11 | 2024
2020, 05 May

DOI: 10.14489/td.2020.05.pp.028-037

Bazulin A. E., Butov A. V., Tikhonov D. S., Romashkin S. V., Zaushitsyn A. V.
USING OF TOFD TECHNOLOGY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SPC “ECHO +”
(pp. 28-37)

Abstract. Since the creation of SPC «ECHO +», special attention has been paid to ultrasonic testing methods that provide visualization of defect images and measurement of their sizes. Due to its high sensitivity and high accuracy, diffraction methods in many cases make it possible to solve the problem of identifying, classifying, and determining the parameters of defects. A review of the capabilities of equipment and software developed by SPC «ECHO +» for the implementation of TOFD technology is presented.

Keywords: ultrasonic testing methods, visualization of defect, TOFD technology, diffraction methods.

A. E. Bazulin, A. V. Butov, D. S. Tikhonov, S. V. Romashkin, A. V. Zaushitsyn (Co Ltd “Scientific Production Center of Nondestructive Ultrasonic Testing “ECHO+”, Moscow, Russia) Е-mail: Данный адрес e-mail защищен от спам-ботов, Вам необходимо включить Javascript для его просмотра. , Данный адрес e-mail защищен от спам-ботов, Вам необходимо включить Javascript для его просмотра. , Данный адрес e-mail защищен от спам-ботов, Вам необходимо включить Javascript для его просмотра. , Данный адрес e-mail защищен от спам-ботов, Вам необходимо включить Javascript для его просмотра. , Данный адрес e-mail защищен от спам-ботов, Вам необходимо включить Javascript для его просмотра.

1. Silk M. G., Lidington B. H. (1975). Defect Sizing using an Ultrasonic Time Delay Approach. British Journal of NDT, Vol. 17, (2), pp. 33 – 36.
2. Unbrakable control. Ultrasonic inspection. Diffraction-time method as a method for detecting and estimating discontinuity sizes. (2012). International Standard No. ISO 16828:2012. [in Russian language]
3. Non-destructive testing of welded joints. The ultrasonic method. Application of the time-domain diffraction method (TOFD). (2011). International Standard No. ISO 10863:2011. [in Russian language]
4. Verkooijen J. (1995). TOFD used to replace radiography. INSIGHT, Vol. 37, (6), pp. 433 – 435.
5. Vopilkin A. H. (Ed.), Badalyan V. G., Bazulin E. G. et al. (2008). Ultrasonic metal defectometry using holographic methods. Moscow: Mashinostroenie. [in Russian language]
6. Bazulin E. G., Vopilkin A. H., Tihonov D. S. (2012). The use of diffraction waves for ultrasonic defectometry in the algorithms of coherent reconstruction of high-quality images of reflectors. V mire nerazrushayushchego kontrolya, 57(3), pp. 20 – 25. [in Russian language]
7. Recommended Practice for Ultrasonic and Magnetic Examination of Offshore Structural Fabrication and Guidelines for Qualification of Technicians. (2004). API Standard No. RP 2X. USA.
8. Welding and non-destructive testing of welded joints. Non-destructive methods of quality control of welded joints of field and main gas pipelines. (2019). Gazprom Organization Standard No. 15-1.3-004–2019. [in Russian language]
9. Brillon C., Armitt T., Dupuis O. (2008). TOFD Inspection with Phased Arrays. 17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing. Shanghai.
10. Bazulin A. E., Pronin V. V., Tihonov D. S. et al. (2014). Continuous ultrasonic thickness measurement of base metal and welds. V mire NK, 66(4), pp. 20 – 26. [in Russian language]
11. ASME Section VIII Code Case 2235 on Ultrasonic Examination of Welds in Lieu of Radiography. (1996).
12. Bazulin A. E. (2010). The calibration system of ultrasonic piezoelectric transducers "AUGUR 5.4". Part II Measurement errors. Kontrol'. Diagnostika, (3), pp. 8 – 20. [in Russian language]
13. Bazulin E. G. (2017). Using the coherence coefficient to improve the image quality of reflectors during ultrasonic testing. Defektoskopiya, (6), pp. 5 – 17. [in Russian language]
14. Instructions for automated ultrasonic testing of welded joints of gas pipelines with wall thickness from 8 to 40 mm by the system of automated ultrasonic testing “AVGUR-TF”. (2016). Instruction on implementing No. MFART-NG1-T1-A/24-K-16. Moscow. [in Russian language]
15. Nord Stream - 2. Construction of an onshore pipeline section in Russia. Mechanized ultrasonic testing procedure using phased arrays and TOFD. Pipelines. (2019). Instruction on implementing No. W-RU-PIP-ONR-PRO-878-000556ER. Moscow. [in Russian language]
16. Automated ultrasonic testing of welded joints from 12 to 300 mm thick using the TOFD time-domain diffraction method. Control Instructions. (2018). Instruction on implementing No. MTOFD-NHP-TS1A-20-KP-17. Moscow. [in Russian language]
17. Shcherbinskiy V. G., Aleshin N. P. (2000). Ultrasonic inspection of welded joints. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo MGTU im. N. E. Baumana. [in Russian language]
18. Morgan L. L. (2018). Transverse Cracking in the Manual and Automated Ultrasonic Testing of Welds. e-Journal of Nondestructive Testing (NDT), (2).
19. Benitez Dzh., Vilyunas Zh. (2011). Automated ultrasonic testing of welded joints Du800 of the RBMK multiple forced circulation loop. WANO Technical Support Mission. Moscow. [in Russian language]
20. C’Shekhar N. Shitole, Zahran O. (2006). W Al-Nuaimy Combining fuzzy logic and neural networks in classification of weld defects using ultrasonic time-of-flight diffraction. The 45th Annual British Conference on NDT. Stratford-upon-Avon.

 

This article  is available in electronic format (PDF).

The cost of a single article is 350 rubles. (including VAT 18%). After you place an order within a few days, you will receive following documents to your specified e-mail: account on payment and receipt to pay in the bank.

After depositing your payment on our bank account we send you file of the article by e-mail.

To order articles please copy the article doi:

10.14489/td.2020.05.pp.028-037

and fill out the  form  

 

 

 
Rambler's Top100 Яндекс цитирования