10.14489/td.2015.03.pp.012-020

2015, 03 March

DOI: 10.14489/td.2015.03.pp.012-020

Ivanov V.I., Konovalov N.N., Kotelnikov V.S., Kotelnikov V.V., Musatov V.V.
RISK ASSESSMENT OF FAILURE WITH USE OF TECHNICAL DIAGNOSING
(pp. 12-20)

Abstract. The estimation of technogenic safety using risk failure indicators finds the increasing application in a national industry. However existing techniques of risk assessment do not provide necessary accuracy and reliability in full extent. It is connected with a number of the reasons, including the use of indicators of failures statistics containing the information on a class of objects, but not considering a technical condition of specific object which is exposed to examination of industrial safety. In the article questions of use of technical diagnosing at an estimation of failure risk are considered. Requirements to the information necessary for an estimation of failure risk are analyzed.

Keywords: technogenic safety, risk of failure, technical diagnosing, non-destructive testing, reliability.

+ - About the Authors Click to collapse

V. I. Ivanov, N. N. Konovalov, V. S. Kotelnikov, V. V. Kotelnikov
Open Joint-stock Company STC “Industrial Safety”, Moscow, Russia. E-mail: Данный адрес e-mail защищен от спам-ботов, Вам необходимо включить Javascript для его просмотра.

V. V. Musatov
Closed Joint-stock Company “GIAP-DISTcentre”, Moscow, Russia

+ - References Click to collapse

1. On amendments to the Federal law «On industrial safety of hazardous production facilities». (2013). Federal Law No. 22-FZ. Russian Federation. Available at: http://www.rg.ru/2013/03/06/prombez-dok.html
2. Guidelines for carrying out risk analysis of hazard-ous production facilities. (2001) Regulation document No. RD 03-418-01. Moscow: FGUP «NTTs «Promyshlennaia bezopasnost'»
3. Lauridsen K., Kozine I., Markert F. et al. (2002). Assessment of uncertainties in risk analysis of chemical es-tablishments. The ASSURANCE project. Final summary report. Roskilde: National Laboratory.
4. Konovalov N. N. (2004). Norming of defects and re-liability of non-destructive testing of welded joints. Moscow: GUP NTTs PB.
5. The security of Russia. Legal, socio-economic and scientific-technical aspects. Risk analysis and security issues: in 4 parts. Part 1. Fundamentals of analysis and safety regulation. Part 2. The civil security and defense systems and risk management. Part 3. Applied questions of risk analysis for critical infrastructure. Part 4. Scientific-methodological basis of risk analysis and security. (2006-2007). Moscow: Znanie.
6. Makhutov N. A., Gadenin M. M. (Eds.), Frolov K. V., Dragunov Iu. G. et al. (2009). Risk analysis and safety improvement in water-cooled power reactors. Moscow: Nauka.
7. Tutnov A. A., Tkachev V. V. (1988). Calculation of the probability of the beginning of brittle destruction of pres-sure vessels. Atomnaia energiia, 64(3), pp. 188-194.
8. Calculation methods and norms of permissible sizes of defects in welded joints of pipes Du 300 KMPTs RBMK. (2003). Guidance documents of the operating organization No. RD EO 0489–03. Russian Federation. Moscow.
9. Volchenko V. N. (1979). The probability and relia-bility of evaluation of the metal quality. Moscow: Metallurgiia.
10. Ivanov V. I., Vlasov I. E. (2002). Several problems of non-destructive testing. Defektoskopiia, (7), pp. 82 – 93.
11. Vlasov I. E., Ivanov V. I. (1998). About defecto metric approaches in ultrasonic testing. Defektoskopiia, (2), p. 41.
12. Shcherbinskii V. G. (2014). The technology of ultra-sonic testing of welded joints. St. Petersburg: SVEN.
13. Fόrli O. (1990). Development and optimization of NDT for practical use – Optimal NDT efforts and use of NDT results. 5 Nordiska NDT Symposiet Esbo, Finland, IIW Re-port Number IIW-V-968-91, p. 46.
14. Visser W. (2002). POD/POS curves for non-destructive examination. HSE BOOKS. Available at: www.hsebooks.co.uk. Evaluation of the sizing results of 12 flaws of the full scale vessel installation (1993). PISC III report No 26 – Action 2 – Phase 1, JRC report No EUR 15371 EN.
15. Badalian V. G., Vopilkin A. Kh. (2010). Monitoring of welded joints of pipelines using AUT systems with coher-ent data processing. Automated ultrasonic inspection of high-risk facilities: jubilee collection of scientific papers. Moscow: OOO NPTs «EKhO+», St. Petersburg: SVEN, pp. 12 – 16.
16. Samokrutov A. A., Shevaldykin V. G. (2011). Ul-trasound imaging of structures using digital focus of antenna array. Defektoskopiia, (1), pp. 21-38.
17. Cherepanov G. P. (1974). Mechanics of brittle de-struction. Moscow: Nauka.
18. Lepikhin A. M., Makhutov N. A., Moskvichev V. V., Cherniaev A. P. (2003). Probabilistic risk analysis of technical systems. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
19. Bogdanov Dzh., Kozin F. (1989). Probabilistic model of damage accumulation. Moscow: Mir.
20. Ivanov V. I., Kuranov V. N., Riabov A. N. (1986). About acoustic emission under low cycle fatigue. DAN, 288(6), pp. 1335 – 1338.
21. Calculation methods and norms of permissible sizes of defects in welded joints of pipes Du 300 KMPTs RBMK. (2002). Guidance documents of the operating organization No. RD EO 0489–03. Russian Federation. Moscow. «Rosenergoatom» Concern.
22. Risk-Based Inspection. (2008). Base Resource Doc-ument. API PUBLICATION 581. 2nd ed. Washington: API Publishing Services.
23. Sergiev B. P., Musatov V. V., Luk'ianenko N. A. (2013). Increasing intervals between overhauls processing units. Experience and practice of CJSC «GIAP-DISTtsentr». Promyshlennyi servis, 48(3), pp. 2 – 9.

+ - Purchase digital version of a single article Click to collapse

This article is available in electronic format (PDF).

The cost of a single article is 350 rubles. (including VAT 18%). After you place an order within a few days, you will receive following documents to your specified e-mail: account on payment and receipt to pay in the bank.

After depositing your payment on our bank account we send you file of the article by e-mail.

To order articles please fill out the form below: