Журнал Российского общества по неразрушающему контролю и технической диагностике
The journal of the Russian society for non-destructive testing and technical diagnostic
 
| Русский Русский | English English |
 
Главная Current Issue
22 | 12 | 2024
2021, 01 January

DOI: 10.14489/td.2021.01.pp.012-025

Elizarov S. V., Terentyev D. A., Medvedev K. A., Ivanov V. I., Halimov A. G., Bardakov V. V.
ACOUSTIC EMISSION TESTING OF FIBERGLASS PIPES AND FITTINGS
(pp. 12-25)

Abstract. Experimental studies was carried out. The purpose was to develop a method to test fiberglass pipelines in operating mode. The acoustic emission method was chosen as the main method of nondestructive testing, and visual and dimensional inspection was chosen as an additional method. Acoustic parameters and acoustic emission properties of fiberglass pipes were determined. It was found that acoustic emission sensors can be installed at distances of up to 9-18 m from each other. A series of loading tests was carried out to refine the methodology. Every loading case was performed until leakage registration. In most cases, leakage occurred near the fillet at pressures of 2.2…3.0 from the working pressure, which indicates a large margin of safety for fiberglass pipes. It is confirmed that the acoustic emission method allows early defect detection. Based on the acoustic emission data, 4 main stages of fiberglass pipes degradation were identified. Visual and dimensional inspection was informative only at stages III – IV. Stage IV in most cases corresponds to the leakage. Even early stage of depressurization was registered as continuous acoustic emission. Signals with amplitudes exceeding 60…80 dB were registered at all loading stages. The location map became informative after filtering events by acoustic emission parameters. A methodology for the testing of fiberglass pipes and fittings in operating mode was developed. It contains, in contrast to the currently valid standards, specific numerical values of various quantities related to both the preparation and carrying out of acoustic emission testing and the classification of the identified sources of acoustic emission according to the degree of danger and allows to evaluate the residual life of fiberglass pipelines. The most informative parameter was the activity of acoustic emission; therefore, it is recommended to carry out loading without holding the pressure. It is planned to carry out additional experiments to clarify the mechanisms of fracture acting at each of the 4 identified stages of degradation.

Keywords: acoustic emision, fiberglass pipes and fittings, residual life, stages of degradation.

S. V. Elizarov, D. A. Terentyev (INTERUNIS-IT LLC, Moscow, Russia) E-mail: Данный адрес e-mail защищен от спам-ботов, Вам необходимо включить Javascript для его просмотра. , Данный адрес e-mail защищен от спам-ботов, Вам необходимо включить Javascript для его просмотра.
K. A. Medvedev (Research and Development Center “EgidA”, Moscow, Russia) E-mail: Данный адрес e-mail защищен от спам-ботов, Вам необходимо включить Javascript для его просмотра.
V. I. Ivanov (RII MSIA “SPECTRUM”, Moscow, Russia) E-mail: Данный адрес e-mail защищен от спам-ботов, Вам необходимо включить Javascript для его просмотра.
A. G. Halimov (Tatneft-Presscomposite LLC, Elabuga, Tatarstan, Russia) E-mail: Данный адрес e-mail защищен от спам-ботов, Вам необходимо включить Javascript для его просмотра.
V. V. Bardakov (INTERUNIS-IT LLC, Russia, Moscow, Russia) E-mail: Данный адрес e-mail защищен от спам-ботов, Вам необходимо включить Javascript для его просмотра.

 

1. Fiberglass pipes on the Russian market. (2010). Kompozitniy mir, (1), pp. 28 – 31. Available at: https://techart.ru/files/publications/extracted_1-28_web.pdf [in Russian language]
2. On industrial safety of hazardous production facilities. Federal Law No. 116-FZ. [in Russian language]
3. Fiberglass linear pipes, tubing, casing and fittings. (2016). Technical Conditions No. TU 2296-001-30372160–2016. Elabuga: OOO «Tatneft'-Presskompozit». [in Russian language]
4. Fiberglass pipes and fittings. Technical conditions. (2010). Ru Standard No. GOST R 53201–2008. Russian Federation. Moscow: Standartinform. [in Russian language]
5. Inspection Practices for Piping System Components. (2016). API Recommended Practice No. 574-2016. 4th ed. Washington: American Petroleum Institute.
6. Rules for the organization and conduct of acoustic emission control of vessels, apparatus, boilers and process pipelines. (2003). Safety regulations No. PB 03-593–03. Moscow: PIO OBT. [in Russian language]
7. Standard Practice for Acoustic Emission Examination of Reinforced Thermosetting Resin Pipe (RTRP). (2016). ASTM International Standard No. E1118/E1118M–2016. West Conshohocken, PA.
8. Non-destructive testing – Acoustic emission testing – Specific methodology and general evaluation criteria for testing of fibre-reinforced polymers. (2015). International Standard No. ISO 18249–15.
9. Ramkumar S. (2016). Predicting Failure Strength of Randomly Oriented Short Glass Fiber-Epoxy Composite Specimen by Artificial Neural Network Using Acoustic Emission Parameters. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 16, pp. 225 – 234. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-016-0072-7
10. Ono K., Gallego A. (2012). Research and Applications of AE on Advanced Composites. Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Acoustic Emission Testing & 7th International Conference on Acoustic Emission EWGAE 30. CAE 7. Granada. Available at: https://www.ndt.net/article/ewgae2012/content/papers/34_Ono.pdf
11. Guo D., Mal A., Ono K. (1996). Wave theory of acoustic emission in composite laminates. Journal of Acoustic Emission, Vol. 14, pp. S19 – S46.
12. Sause M. G. R., Horn S. (2010). Simulation of Lamb wave excitation for different elastic properties and acoustic emission source geometries. Journal of Acoustic Emission, Vol. 28, pp. 142 – 154.
13. Crawford A., Ghazi Droubi M., Faisal N. (2018). Modal Acoustic Emission analysis of mode-I and mode-II fracture of adhesively bonded joints. Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the European Working Group on Acoustic Emission. Senlis. Available at: https://www.ndt.net/article/ewgae2018/papers/1.pdf
14. Potstada P., Rosini S., Mavrogordato M. et al. (2018). Combination of synchrotron computed tomography and acoustic emission measurements for cyclic loading of fibre-reinforced composites. Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the European Working Group on Acoustic Emission. Senlis. Available at: https://www.ndt.net/article/ewgae2018/papers/4.pdf
15. Hamstad M. A., O’Gallagher A., Gary J. (2002). Examination of the Application of a Wavelet Transform to Acoustic Emission Signals. Journal of Acoustic Emission, Vol. 20, pp. 39 – 81.
16. Viktorov I. A. (1966). Physical foundations of the application of Rayleigh and Lamb ultrasonic waves in technology. Moscow: Nauka. [in Russian language]
17. Terent'ev D. A. (2013). Identification of acoustic emission signals using time-frequency analysis. V mire nerazrushayushchego kontrolya, 60(2), pp. 51 – 55. [in Russian language]
18. Barat V., Terentyev D., Bardakov V., Elizarov S. (2020). Analytical Modeling of Acoustic Emission Signals in Thin-Walled Objects. Applied Sciences, Vol. 10, (1). DOI: 10.3390/app10010279.
19. Listvin A. V., Listvin V. N. (2005). Reflectometry of optical fibers, pp. 90 – 92. Moscow: LESARart. [in Russian language]
20. Pipes and pipeline parts made of thermosetting plastics reinforced with fiberglass. Methods for obtaining hydro-static design basis and calculated pressure value. (2016). Ru Standard No. GOST R 57069–2016. Russian Federation. Moscow: Standartinform. [in Russian language]
21. Standard Practice for Obtaining Hydrostatic or Pressure Design Basis for “Fiberglass” (Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Thermosetting-Resin) Pipe and Fittings. (2012). ASTM International Standard No. D2992–12. West Conshohocken, PA.
22. Petroleum and natural gas industries – Glass-reinforced plastics (GRP) piping – Part 2: Qualification and manufacture. (2017). International Standard No. ISO 14692-2–2017. Brussels.
23. Technical diagnostics. Acoustic emission diagnostics. General requirements. (2007). Ru Standard No. GOST R 52727–2007. Russian Federation. Moscow: Standartinform. [in Russian language]
24. Technical diagnostics. Acoustic emission diagnostics. Terms, definitions and designations. (2019). Ru Standard No. GOST R 55045–2012. Russian Federation. Moscow: Standartinform. [in Russian language]
25. Ivanov V. I., Barat V. A. (2017). Acoustic emission diagnostics: a handbook. Moscow: Izdatel'skiy dom «Spektr». [in Russian language]
26. Brunner A. J. (2016). Correlation between acoustic emission signals and delaminations in carbon fiber-reinforced polymer-matrix composites: a new look at mode I fracture test data. Proceedings of the 32st Conference of the European Working Group on Acoustic Emission, Prague. Prague. Available at: https://www.ndt.net/article/ewgae2016/papers/55_paper.pdf
27. Ivanov V. I., Belov P. A., Nasibullin T. S. (2016). Types of acoustic emission sources in composite materials. Kontrol'. Diagnostika, (10), pp. 14 – 20. [in Russian language] DOI: 10.14489/td.2016.10.pp.014-020
28. Matvienko Yu. G., Vasil'ev I. E., Ivanov V. I. (2016). Acoustic emission diagnostics of the process of destruction of the composite structure under tensile, compressive and cyclic loads. Defektoskopiya, (8), pp. 30 – 46. [in Russian language]

This article  is available in electronic format (PDF).

The cost of a single article is 4

50 rubles. (including VAT 18%). After you place an order within a few days, you will receive following documents to your specified e-mail: account on payment and receipt to pay in the bank.

After depositing your payment on our bank account we send you file of the article by e-mail.

To order articles please copy the article doi:

10.14489/td.2021.01.pp.012-025

and fill out the  form  

 

 

 
Search
Rambler's Top100 Яндекс цитирования